Discussion about this post

User's avatar
irene jarosewich's avatar

dozens of small(er) countries cannot afford to maintain embassies and consulates in 150-190 nations worldwide. an original goal of the UN was to offer a year-round venue for diplomats to meet, discuss, relay information to/from home countries re foreign policy realities of other countries on the assumption that accurate information and consistent communication is good. Expectations that the UN "never does anything" are misplaced. Except for a few specific UN organizations/programs, the UN in tooto was not established as nor given the authority to be an action body, rather, as you noted - networking, information sharing, partnership development. With the advent of SM and a real upgrade in UN WebTV during past decade, has become a genuine communication boon for above mentioned small(er) countries. Until his departure in early 2025, PMU Representative, Amb. Serhiy Kyslytsia became masterful at using UN venues. His UNSC statements condeming russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine provided tight, nibble summations, some dripping with sarcasm, aimed at russia and its soviet-style representative, Nebenzya, of the war's realities, information that was then picked up by the media and in turn, sent forth into the public. Besides offering the ability for state representatives to communicate among themselves, the UN is an outward-facing PR tool for those who know how to use it. at an event two-three years ago at the PMU, former UNGA President Dennis Francis, who seemed to have had a genuinely cordial relationship with Amb. Kyslytsia - not always so common at the UN - noted to me, and I paraphrase slightly -"Ambassador Kyslytsia has reminded all of us of why we are here - not to just attend receptions, but to do our job, to be diplomats." Ukraine has benefitted during the past four-five years from the UN - not because it "does" something "action-oriented" but because it provides a public platform for Ukraine, and other smaller nations, to tell to tell their stories, consistently. Is it perfect? No. Is there waste and bloat? Sure - as is the case with many if not most bureaucracies. But the condemnations that that the UN "never does anything" or "is useless" are inaccurate since they are rooted in a misunderstanding of the basic purpose of the UN.

Dave's avatar

The first time you brought tears to my eyes. I have a friend across the street. She is from Ukraine. Two years ago she went, with her young son, to visit her Mother in Ukraine. A Grandmother that had never met her Grandson. Today, she worries about her Mother making it through the winter. She rarely smiles.

Thanks for your work with UNICEF and WHO. I agree with your claim that the UN is toothless especially with its goal of maintaining International Peace. I recall, as a young man, being proud of Canadian peacekeepers in their light blue uniforms. However, sixty-five years later the World is a much different place, The number of countries with autocratic, dictatorial leaders has increased 50% since the 1960's and even more since 1945. This has created a political environment where consensus is impossible. It's better to use funding for the other humanitarian objectives of the UN and stop fooling ourselves.

No posts

Ready for more?