Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave's avatar

“This is the way of life, too. We experience things, and because of that, we get a new perspective on the world. We may wish to go back to that innocent view that we once held, but we can never go back to that old way of looking at the world because our new view will always taint the old one.” (John Collings, You Can Never Go Back to the Green, January 9, 2019). So, how do we handle this cognitive dissonance positively and progressively? I’ve been thinking about this a lot. It could start with a redefinition of the terms of reference for Freedom & Morality. Freedom, for example, is seen quite differently by Americans and by Russians. For example, Russians and Americans each think they have more Freedom than they do. Russians use a different definition for Freedom while Americans think they have absolute freedom, but actually don’t. Morality, Hanno Sauer, in his book The Invention of Good and Evil, points out many of the flaws in the way we think about morality. One of his conclusions is that Social Ideologies and Political beliefs are both fragile and unstable. Beliefs and ideologies have been defined by intellectuals in the past. In today’s world, the loudest voice is the most influential. I think the Intellectuals of the World have to step up and retake their leadership role in this area. I see Mark Carney as the type of leader and intellectual who could re-shape ideologies of a whole country.

No posts

Ready for more?