Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Phil Tanny's avatar

You write, "The sticking point is how to make use of those assets to fund a loan to Ukraine without confiscating them, as that risks breaking international law and undermining the credibility of the euro on the global stage. "

If international law prohibits confiscating the assets of bloodthirsty psychopathic killers, screw international law, ignore it, and DO THE RIGHT THING.

Here's the truth behind the worry of "undermining the credibility of the euro". EU bankers want to keep on profiting from managing the money of psychopaths like Putin. EU leaders are simply lying to their publics. EU leaders want to protect the bankers, at the cost of continuing to put their citizens at unnecessary risk. Over three years of inexcusable delays, it's all just BS.

The $300 billion of Russian money in EU and American banks is enough money to build 300,000 Ukrainian Flamingo cruise missiles, way more than are needed to crash Russia's oil business and win this war. EU leaders could save Ukraine and end the threat to the EU without spending a dime of EU taxpayers money. But instead they are worried about the profits of bankers who are already rich.

The function of journalists at this point should be to very publicly shove this reality down the throats of EU leaders so that they have to choke on it until they stop screwing around and do the right thing. Really, honest to God, the endless dithering while innocent people die is just completely inexcusable.

Expand full comment

No posts